Your company is the owner of the project with one of the main building having just collapsed, or something like the collapsed roof belonging to the Terengganu Stadium (The Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin Stadium). On the other hand, what if you are the contractor or consultant for that project…. probably having many nightmares by now. Leaving aside the Sultan Mizan Stadium, you would probably be spending alot of time re-looking at the insurance policies having purchased for the project. Now whether those losses relating to the building collapse is covered or not, would depend on the following…..
If the event occurred whilst in the course of construction or within the project period, chances those losses are covered in the Contractor All Risks insurance policy. However, if those losses are directly relating to designs ūüė≥ , these may fall outside the ambit of the policy coverage; but this may not be too bad if resultant damages coverage is extended into the basic CAR policy – at least those indirect losses to design faults are covered . But if the project has been completed and falls under the maintenance period or handled over to the owner or possibly in operational, then chances such collapse is not going to be covered ūüė≥ within the CAR policy.
In this connection, whether you are the owner or the contractor or consultant, you and your company are damned! The only thing to work on would be to go after each others’ throat and blood….and if the contractor and consultant turned bankrupt, there would be nothing that the owner can recover, thus, the end game is a lose-for-all situation.
Coming back to the Sultan Mizan Stadium, our Works Minister had already declared in the news that “Shoddy works” and the “Use of sub-standard building materials” were the real cause of the collapse. In addition, he also mentioned elements concerning building as hastily built and lack or possibly no proper supervision was carried out. Now just like what we have earlier described, the blame game starts…. the contractor would be disputing the so called shoddy job and the use of substandard materials, and would be seeking proof that all the necessary tasks had been carried out, including complying with all design parameters. Ultimately, the government would probably win but gets nothing out of it, except and maybe, just to blacklist the contractor(s) or consultant(s) concerned, which the latter would probably choose to take it towards the litigation process. Just a thought, would the whole episode looks better, sounds more intelligent if a Project (D&C) Professional Indemnity Insurance¬† is made a prerequisite for all contractors and consultants before commencement of the project?
Perhaps, it is good if we can also refresh our memory in respect of “Cracks appearing on the MRR2 Highway” that resulted in a shut-down of major sections back in mid-2004. In 2006, it was closed again and in 2008, it was the third closure! Every other consultants and contractors were arguing over design defects and not complying with various engineering standards….
Now what exactly is this Single-Project (Design & Construct) Professional Indemnity (PI) covers?
Firstly, this would depends on the contractual obligations (the extent of design & general construction aspects) as prescribed for completion of the project, and secondly, insurance cover hinges along the “Professional Activities” line.
The insurance generally covers the consultant or contractor‚Äôs legal liability in respect of any claim first made against them and notified to the insurer during the period of insurance. In regards to the term, ‚ÄĚlegal liability‚Äú, this must arose from any negligent act, error or omission committed or allegedly committed by the Contractor / Consultant (professional staff or professional party engaged) in their conduct and execution of the Professional activities directly relating to the Project mentioned. Costs and expenses involve in any defence, settlement or investigation of any claims within policy coverage are payable.
While having put the operative clause of the policy cover in simplistic form, it is good practice if we learn up some terms of reference used in the policy wordings:
1. Approved Designs means designs must be approved by the relevant government authorities.
2. Professional Activities ‚Äď meaning condensed as follow:
|‚Äú‚Ä¶preparation of detailed design documentation in accordance with those preliminary designs as provided to the Contractor / Consultant by the project owner, and the inspection process involved during the construction stages to ensure that those designs are being complied.‚ÄĚ|
3. Professional Staff and Professional Party engaged ‚Äď condensed as follow:
|‚Äú‚Ä¶..those professional qualified personnel (those having a relevant bachelor degree in an appropriate construction design related discipline such as architecture or engineering, or personnel currently certified, licensed, registered or authorised under the the relevant legislation or industry codes of practice governing such relevant profession…). These professionals may also include professional sub-contractors and External Design consultants.
…..for consulting brief, this shall include advice given in respect of designs, testing and research and development of designs and verification of designs”
Thus Project PI would only be made available for those contractors that operate with a designated Design Department in place. Such PI would be most relevant to Turnkey Contractor and Consultants with direct involvement with designs.
How is the demand and supply situation for Single-Project PI?
Currently, very few owners and principals request for single-Project PI from contractor or consultant – what is commonly requested in respect of any PI cover (annual policy) would be from the consulting engineers or perhaps architects….All such annual PI policies are usually purchased to cover consultant’s consulting portfolio, thus there would be issues of “gaps”, adequacy of cover and relevancy of cover to project may be brought into dispute in any event of a claim. But then what about the contractor, especially those that are engaging sub-consultants or play significant roles in design applications?
If there are any current demand from the Malaysian marketplace, these are mainly driven by insurance broking fraternity. Such demand tends to be on a term basis aggregated across the project including maintenance and run off over a period of 6 to 10 years period ‚Äď Single PI cover. High limits are usually needed ‚Äď it is standard for large contractor companies to purchase limits in excess of RM20million for PI insurance, with contractual terms often dictate that the PI must be carried for up to 6 years post-completion. The main contractor could also request that their sub-consultants and sub-contractors to likewise take similar PI cover.
However from the supply aspect, the local Malaysian players are unlikely to have readily available treaty or any obligatory capacity to write such kind of risks. In most cases, insurers would only front for the risk and make large placements to the London markets. But then, if this Project PI is made compulsory in similar fashion as being applied for CAR, Workmen and Performance Bond, then the markets for such product are certain to grow exponentially……
Has this blog writeup interest you? You want to know more? Do contact the writer for more information…….