Category: Insurance Practices

The Riot Strike Malicious Damage Insurance Cover | #LowYat_Riot-2015

In the aftermath of the riot and /or malicious damage occurrence at Low Yat Plaza on the 12th July 2015, the public was wondering what could have gone wrong – there were numerous versions as to what having caused such an untoward event to happen – perhaps it was the petty theft incidence or was it about the merchant having cheated the customer by selling a cloned phone for a genuine version, or this was triggered by a group of political trolls, maybe thugs? Additional questions? Of course, we are looking at this from the insurance angle….
Was this event a riot to begin with?

SNATCH THEFT COMMITTED ON A MOTORCYCLE | A RECENT CASE LAW (court of appeal)

Section 94 and 95 of the RTA 1987 prohibits an insurer from relying on certain terms in an insurance policy for the purposes of excluding liability. On the other hand a term or condition which does not come within the purview of section 94 and 95 may be legitimately relied upon by the insurer for the purposes of excluding liability under the policy when a claim is brought by a third party. The question now is whether Section 91(1)(b) of the RTA 1987 can be legitimately relied upon by the Appellant to exclude liability. The answer to this question lies in section 95(k) of the RTA 1987 itself.






GOVERNMENT SERVICE TAX (GST) | A RELIEF TOO FAR

Recent updates on GST for weekend reading…. (1) Relief granted on transitional motor and fire PERSONAL insurance policies a) Transitional relief to PERSONAL LINES FIRE POLICY The General Insurance Association (PIAM) had appealed to the Ministry Of Finance (MOF) recently…

Residential stratified properties now ‘GST exempt supply’

This is really beyond Insurance but since this is about GST and certain types of residential properties where the application of GST would have significant impact on our daily lives, I think putting up a simple blog posting here makes…

Insurance Industry in 2014 | A Malaysian Perspectives

Detariffication (where both Motor and Fire related insurances are going down the free market path) is not exact a bad word but as the industry probe along, people seem to have differing viewpoints and at time some are wondering why are we so jittery about this…. — the industry is already operating its Marine, Miscellaneous Accident, Liability and Engineering classes without much of a problem. Of course they may had forgotten the combined Motor and Fire contributed some 67% of the overall non-life premium for the country; that’s the very reason why the authority is concerned.






The risk of “reckless prudence”

“We are so risk adverse that we are requiring levels of capital that are probably beyond what is sensible, and intrusive supervision which I think is not really sustainable,” he added. There has been a very sharp swing of the pendulum post-global financial crisis for the financial system as a whole, he said.






Five benefits insurers could gain from the connected home

Great to explore the main benefits insurers could derive from the connected home, if they play their cards right. With analysts forecasting the connected home market will be worth billions in 2018, insurers unsurprisingly want a piece of the action. But with home telematics developing on very different lines to its vehicle counterpart, some wonder where insurance fits in….






Insurance innovation focuses on claims | a changing frontier

Many activities are stand-alone solutions, process solutions, or simply new ways of approaching a traditional task. Advancements are found in all aspects of the value chain – from location based services being provided at the point of first notice of loss, to photo recognition tools






Insurance (Exemption) Order 2009 and Order 2012?

In 2012, the following orders were also introduced under the Insurance Act 1996 (now repealed and replaced by Financial Services Act 2013) to strength those liberalisation measures:
Insurance (Exemption)(No. 2) Order 2012; Insurance (Exemption)(Amendment) Order 2012; and Insurance (Approved International Marine, Aviation and Transit Insurance Brokers) Regulations 2012






Aviation Legal Liability | Airline Will Not Escape Liability if Act of War Caused Crash

Pray For MH17

Officials say 283 passengers and 15 crew members died when the flight crashed in Ukraine near the Russian border on Thursday. So far, there is no evidence that the aircraft malfunctioned; officials say it was brought down by a Russian-made antiaircraft missile. But according to the Montreal Convention, a 1999 international treaty that governs airline liability and compensation for the victims of air disasters, Malaysia Airlines is liable, regardless of whether it is at fault for the crash. Airlines do not have to pay for damaged cargo if it’s damaged in an act of war. But in the case of death or injury to passengers, the aircraft carrier can be held liable for up to 113,100 Special Drawing Rights, an updating, weighted average of convertible currencies.